Bendi新闻
>
For China’s Parks, How Open Is Too Open?

For China’s Parks, How Open Is Too Open?

7月前

A recent televised debate has sparked renewed interest in 24-hour parks.

This January, local officials in the suburban Shanghai district of Minhang organized a curious event. Borrowing a model pioneered elsewhere, including nearby Yangpu District, they brought together more than 300 urban development stakeholders, from community officials to academics and planners, and asked them to debate a simple question: Should the district’s largest park be open to the public 24 hours a day?

While the debate was tightly moderated, the resulting back-and-forth — which the district filmed and uploaded to its social media channels — got surprisingly heated. Last year, Shanghai ordered district officials to evaluate the necessity of all-night park access, but left the final decision to local officials, who were told to canvass public opinion. This gave the debate real stakes. Advocates pushed the benefits of openness, from better integration with nearby businesses to the positives late-night access would bring nearby residents, many of whom work long, stressful hours in the tech industry. Opponents complained about the heavy cost involved in staffing the park throughout the night or cited data from the city’s other parks with longer opening times showing that demand for after-hours access worked out to roughly three visitors a day. Some of the exchanges got personal: In response to one advocate who said increased access might help them deal with their insomnia, a critic replied that planning decisions couldn’t be made on the basis of “abnormal” people.

Though this debate was focused on a specific park, the war of words reflects a larger divide in Chinese urbanism. City parks in China are generally publicly owned and managed by the municipal facilities department, but that doesn’t mean they are open to everyone all the time. Many parks are walled off; entrance is generally free, but opening and closing times are strictly enforced, with some cutting off admittance as early as 7:30 p.m. While a number of cities have extended those hours in recent years, it remains to be seen how much demand there is for all-night access.

Given its large park system, decisions taken in Shanghai could have a national impact. In 2011, the city experimented with longer summer hours for 35 of its parks, eventually expanding the program to 369 parks — about 91% of all its parks — by 2021. Of those, 357 operate on extended hours throughout the year, with some opening as early as 5 a.m. and closing as late as 10 p.m.

The public response to this initiative has been positive. In a 2019 study conducted by East China Normal University, almost 90% of respondents said they were “very satisfied” or “relatively satisfied” with the longer opening times. Park managers were more reserved — 98% said keeping parks open for longer would cause problems — but 70% still expressed support for the measure.

The recent debate in the Minhang hearing came to a similar conclusion: The majority of participants saw 24-hour schedules as the right move; they simply disagreed over whether — and how — to prepare for the problems that might arise.

A televised debate about the opening time of Minhang Cultural Park held on Jan. 29, 2024. From @今日闵行 on WeChat

In the East China Normal University survey, respondents pointed to several obstacles to extending parks’ hours of operation. Foremost were the issues of lighting and safety — both of which cost money. The study found that, since 2011, 81% of Shanghai parks have increased staffing in response to their longer opening times, adding an average of three janitors, four security staff, and two general management staffers per park. The increased costs associated with those changes were borne primarily by the agencies overseeing those parks. Roughly 70% of parks with extended hours saw increased expenditures; just 20% were given special funding to make up the gap.

Similar problems plague other cities around the world. In response to security risks in large urban parks, both the United Kingdom and the United States created park police forces. The U.K. has the Royal Parks Constabulary, which reports to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and is funded by the Royal Parks Agency. Likewise, the U.S. Park Police — one of the oldest federal law enforcement agencies in the country — oversees management of many well-known monuments, in addition to preventing, investigating, and apprehending suspects of crimes committed on park grounds. Open parks in Singapore are protected by strict laws with clear penalties like the Parks and Trees Act.

China has no equivalent bodies or regulations. But that doesn’t mean our parks will become hotbeds of crime. In “The Death and Life of Great American Cities,” urbanist Jane Jacobs points out that healthy cities ensure safety by depending on “an intricate, almost unconscious, network of voluntary controls and standards among the people themselves, and enforced by the people themselves,” instead of constant surveillance. She argued that violent crime could be deterred simply by increasing park usage. If longer park hours lead to higher usage, rather than an increase in dimly lit and unoccupied areas, then that may help alleviate security risks in large cities.

The key to realizing that vision is involving citizens in park governance. For example, New York’s Central Park fell into serious decline in the 1960s as the city deurbanized. In 1980, the Central Park Conservancy, a nonprofit organization, was established to manage day-to-day operations, promote broader public participation in rehabilitating the park, and lead the park out of crisis. There are signs that a model like this could work in China: The ECNU survey found that 57% of respondents were willing to volunteer in park management, and 80% of those indicated their willingness to do so on an unpaid basis.

Minhang has announced plans for the park under discussion to extend its hours until midnight, with plans to operate it 24 hours a day from April. If the city is actually ready and willing to institute a bottom-up park governance model, including community input and participation from nonprofits and other social organizations, many of the obstacles to a truly open and public park system can be overcome.

You Xudong is a researcher specializing in cities and architecture.

Translator: Katherine Tse; editor: Cai Yineng.

(Header image: A boy takes photos of tulips at Minhang Cultural Park, Shanghai, March 2, 2024. The park has extended its opening times from 5 a.m. to 12 p.m. since March 1, and plans to open 24 hours a day starting from April. VCG)


Download the new Sixth Tone app at the App Store or Google Play
APK file for Android:
https://image4.sixthtone.com/pkg/sixthtone.apk
(Copy URL and open in browser)

微信扫码关注该文公众号作者

来源:Sixth Tone

相关新闻

“花开了”英语可不是“flower is open”!到底该怎么表达呢?For China’s Workers, 2024 Is the Year of Staying PutFor China’s Plus-Size Women, Going Out Is a Daily Struggle休斯顿糖城纯实木打造经典美式别墅周日Open House~​休斯顿黄金位置低税三层美房仅售$23.4万,周日Open House!新学年的“开放日”Open House就要来啦!除了看看学校的硬件设施外,我们还可以从中获得什么有效信息?休斯顿好学区经典户型实用大平层,周日Open House休斯顿气派美房位置超级优越,周六Open HouseOpen AI的神秘项目“草莓”,到底是什么?7月12&14日Open House!Weston宜居宝地,安静街道大草坪,独家臻品房源抢先看!天演资本 | Open Day 报名开启!百亿量化 | 天演资本 Open Day 报名开启!对话程旭欣:Open-TeleVision教你如何沉浸式遥操机器人速来!潞晨Open-Sora羊毛可薅,10元轻松上手视频生成上证失守3000点,AI应用概念走强;Open AI宣布将对中国停止服务;哪吒汽车向港交所递交招股书|一周市场盘点麻省顶尖学区,波士顿学区豪宅,本周Open House房源精选--Brookline/Newton/ Winchester麻州顶级学区,波士顿优质学区房,本周Open House房源精选--Weston/Newton/Wellesley还得是开源!潞晨Open-Sora技术路线公开,一键生成16秒720p视频,质量更高训练成本更低Open AI CEO承认:AI终将毁灭人类?!前员工公开内部恐怖!KubeCon+CloudNativeCon+Open Source Summit+AI_Dev China 2024十年来最大更新!苹果发布会宣布与Open AI合作 进入“个人智能”时代这个团队做了OpenAI没Open的技术,开源OpenRLHF让对齐大模型超简单麻州顶级学区,波士顿好房推荐,本周Open House房源精选--Wellesley/Newton/Lexington直降10万美金!6/1 Open House!Newton顶尖学区新翻独栋,舒适生活,便捷交通
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 bendi.news
Bendi新闻
Bendi.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Bendi.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。