Bendi新闻
>
太空发射市场分析:小型火箭发射服务供应商发展局限性及后续产品竞争情况

太空发射市场分析:小型火箭发射服务供应商发展局限性及后续产品竞争情况

6月前



小型发射火箭


高发射速率模型的局限性和重型后续产品的竞赛

猎鹰1号于2009年从奥梅莱克岛发射升空。

图源:Euroconsult



小型发射服务现状


Small launchers

在财务压力和来自SpaceX Transporter的激烈竞争下,商用小型发射器(企业)现在正在竞相开发重型下一代发射器,他们希望能够在更大的市场上开放。事实上,自2017年以来筹集了90亿美元的私人资金后,商业小型发射器总共只积压了4亿美元的发射合同,除了火箭实验室之外,其次最先进的公司到目前为止只发射了一两次。

因此,市场似乎正在重新发现20年前SpaceX的猎鹰1号的教训,小型发射运营商不满足于小型卫星专用发射市场,而是直接转向重型后续发射。不过,这一次,竞争者更多,需求格局正在迅速变化,所有西方发射供应商都面临着来自SpaceX现在重型发射器和即将推出的星际飞船的激烈竞争。

由于每公斤价格高(比SpaceX Transporter的入门价格高出5或10倍),以及整体发射率低,商业小型发射器大多是利基用户,例如政府技术演示器,投入使用的卫星或具有特定注入需求的小型立方体卫星星座。国防用户的快速入轨时间和响应能力通常被推销为他们的强项,弥补了高昂的价格,但到目前为止,对于大多数供应商来说,他们的反应性(从合同到轨道的时间)超过一年。

与此同时,小型发射器错过了大部分星座发射需求(占未来十年内发射卫星的82%),因为星座运营商成本受限更大,并且星座用户需要快速部署,这只能通过批量或拼车的方式搭载重型载具(立方体卫星星座之外)来实现。截至 2023 年,在所有发射器类型的发射器总运量为 2300 吨中,商业供应商在小型发射器上显示的星座卫星仅占发射质量 4 吨(几乎全是立方体卫星)。

由于有效载荷能力的降低和发射行业的不可压缩成本的结合,导致利润微薄,实现高发射率是大多数小型发射器的关键,也是吸引更多星座客户的唯一途径。但到目前为止,在有限股权融资首次推出之后扩大运营已被证明是非常具有挑战性的。自 2023 年以来,一家备受瞩目的小型发射提供商破产,另一家公司以一小部分估值离开纳斯达克。即使是成立于18年前,7年前首次发射Electron的火箭实验室,也保持着每年9次发射的记录(不包括中国政府的固体发射器)。



后续发展

Follow-up development


几乎所有新兴的小型发射公司现在都计划在更大的市场上推出更重的后续产品,试图摆脱高速率、低利润/发射经济模式。然而,由于筹集的大部分股权资金已经用于小型第一代发射器,因此后续的大量资金往往不确定。下一代重型发射器将更昂贵,开发时间更长,对私人投资者的要求更高,这些投资者经常因为害怕错过而加入,并且尚未看到他们的初始投资回报。

与此同时,许多供应商正在向其他太空业务多元化发展,这表明其核心业务面临压力。例如,最先进的小型发射提供商 Rocket Lab 在 2023 年将其三分之二的收入来自卫星制造活动。其他供应商已经宣布了空间系统或子系统的多样化,例如Astra的卫星推进,以及Phantom Space和Gilmour Space的卫星系统或子系统。

另一个值得关注的领域是带有轨道转移飞行器的小型卫星最后一英里交付(Last-mile delivery——LMD,帮助搭车、拼单的卫星更好更经济地达到目标轨道),这是一项额外的移动服务,作为其核心发射业务的需求中继。Firefly 将推出其 OTV Elytra,该品牌拥有 2023 年收购 Spaceflight 的强大传统。Skyrora也在计划OTV,而Launcher Space最初是一家小型发射公司,已经完全转向LMD,在被VAST收购后停止了其发射器计划。即使是蓝色起源,虽然不是一个小型发射运营商,现在也在计划OTV。

到目前为止,似乎还没有人完全破解可持续商业小型发射的密码。小型发射频率很低,供应商的任何两次发射间隔大约一年(火箭实验室和中国政府的固体发射器除外),每公斤的特定价格通常超过运输车入门价格的 10 倍,这使得小型发射器大多是小众用户。在猎鹰1号首次发射近20年后,市场被提醒,小型卫星不一定需要小型发射器,大多数新兴供应商都面临着为其重型继任者提供资金的疑虑。然而,随着SpaceX对重型发射市场的日益垄断和重型发射的近期瓶颈,许多用户越来越热衷于寻找替代供应商,其中许多供应商直接受到它的启发,并在其之后受到启发。尽管如此,SpaceX的模式是否能够被复制还有待观察,该模式结合了最大的、自筹资金的卫星星座需求、可重复使用性和美国政府的广泛需求支撑。




点击文末阅读原文链接即可访问Euroconsult公司为Opac Channel订阅读者提供的太空物流市场分析报告服务报价




英文原文



Under financial strain and strong competition from SpaceX Transporter, commercial small launchers are now racing to heavy next-generation launchers they hope will open on larger markets. Indeed, after $9 billion raised in private funding since 2017, commercial small launchers hold a combined backlog of only $400 million in launch contracts and besides Rocket Lab, the next most advanced companies have launched only once or twice so far.

Thus, it seems the market is rediscovering the lessons learnt from SpaceX’s Falcon 1 twenty years ago, with small launch operators not content of the smallsat dedicated launch market and moving straight to heavy follow-ons. This time though, there are more contenders, the demand landscape is rapidly changing, and all western launch providers face intense competition from SpaceX’s now-heavy launchers and upcoming Starship.

With high price and low frequency small launchers miss out on most of the market

With a high price per kg (up to 5 or 10 times higher than entry price on SpaceX Transporter), and low launch rates overall, commercial small launchers find mostly niche users such as government technology demonstrators, bring-into-use satellites, or small cubesat constellations with specific injection needs. Fast time-to-orbit and responsiveness for defense users has often been marketed as their strong suit, making up for high price, but so far their reactivity (time from contracting to orbit) stands at over one year for most providers.

Meanwhile small launchers miss out on most of the constellation launch demand (making up 82% of satellites to be launched within the next decade), as constellation operators are more cost-constrained and seek rapid deployment, which can only be achieved by batch or rideshare launches on heavy vehicles (outside of cubesat constellations). As of 2023, constellation satellites manifested on small launchers with commercial providers accounted for only 4 tons of launch mass (almost entirely cubesats), out of a total 2 300 tons for all launcher types.

Due to the combination of reduced payload capacity and the incompressible costs of the launch industry, resulting in thin margins, achieving high launch rates is key for most small launcher and the only way to attract more constellation customers. But ramping up operations beyond first launch on limited equity funding has proven very challenging so far. Since 2023, one high profile small launch provider has gone bankrupt and another has left NASDAQ with a fraction of its valuation. Even Rocket Lab, which was founded 18 years ago and first launched Electron 7 years ago, holds a record of 9 launches per year (excluding Chinese government solid launchers).

Small launch providers racing to heavy follow-ons – again.

Hence, almost all emerging small launch companies are now planning heavier follow-on vehicles opening on larger markets, trying to move away from a high rate, low margin/launch economic model. However, with most equity funding raised already spent in small first-generation launchers, funding of the heavy follow-on is often uncertain. Next-gen heavy launchers will be more expensive and longer to develop, asking more from private investors who often joined out of fear of missing out, and have yet to see a return on their initial investments.

Thus, present commercial small launchers are following the path SpaceX took in the late 2000s, abandoning Falcon 1 and all plans for small launch after 5 launches and moving on to the heavy Falcon 9 which would open on much larger markets (and was almost entirely financed by NASA’s commercial Human spaceflight programs). SpaceX’s Transporter rideshare opportunities are now the biggest challenge to all small launch providers, having launched 81% of small satellite globally (not counting Starlink and chinese satellites) from 2019 to 2023.

Small launch providers diversifying across the board

Meanwhile, indicating pressure on their core business, many providers are diversifying into other space businesses. Rocket Lab for instance, the most advanced small launch provider, in 2023 stemmed two-thirds of its revenue from satellite manufacturing activities. Other providers have announced diversifications in space systems or subsystems, such as satellite propulsion for Astra, and satellite systems or subsystems for Phantom Space and Gilmour Space.

Another area of interest is smallsat Last Mile Delivery (LMD) with Orbital transfer Vehicles, an additional mobility service acting as demand relay for its core launch business. Firefly is to introduce its OTV Elytra, with strong heritage from its acquisition of Spaceflight in 2023. Skyrora too is planning an OTV while Launcher Space, initially a small launch company, has pivoted entirely into LMD, discontinuing its launcher program when acquired by VAST. Even Blue Origin, though not a small launch operator, is now planning an OTV.

Lessons for the launch market

So far, it seems no one has fully cracked the code for sustainable commercial small launch. Small launch frequency is low, with about a year between a provider’s any two launches (except for Rocket Lab and Chinese government solid launchers), and specific prices per kg are typically over 10 times the Transporter entry price, leaving small launchers with mostly niche users.

Almost 20 years after Falcon 1’s first launch, the market is reminded that small satellites do not necessarily call for small launchers, and most of the emerging providers face doubts about funding their heavy successors. Yet, with SpaceX’s growing monopoly on the heavy launch market and near-term bottleneck on heavy launch, many users are increasingly keen on seeing alternative providers, many of which were directly inspired by it and instigated in its wake. Still, it has yet to be seen if SpaceX’s model, combining the largest, self-funded satellite constellation demand, reusability and extensive US government demand, can be replicated.


译者注

本文搬运自Euroconsult。原作者Gabriel Deville为Novaspace航天工业的顾问,负责监督咨询任务和市场情报报告。他专门从事太空物流和在轨服务,是Novaspace太空物流市场报告的编辑。

Opac Channel编译



>End


>>>                        
本文转载自“Opac Channel”,原标题《太空发射市场分析:小型火箭发射服务供应商发展局限性及后续产品竞争情况【大道消息·航天版】》。
为分享前沿资讯及有价值的观点,太空与网络微信公众号转载此文,并经过编辑。
未按照规范转载及引用者,我们保留追究相应责任的权利
部分图片难以找到原始出处,故文中未加以标注,如若侵犯了您的权益,请第一时间联系我们。

HISTORY/往期推荐




坚持道路自信 直面未来挑战——“对标SpaceX”的思考



混合所有制模式:新型举国体制在商业航天发展中的逻辑演进和实践路径(之一)



混合所有制模式:商业航天领域推进新型举国体制的重要途径



迪斯尼传播快乐,美丽星球点亮梦想



>>>                  

充满激情的新时代,

充满挑战的新疆域,

与踔厉奋发的引领者,

卓尔不群的企业家,

一起开拓,

一起体验,

一起感悟,

共同打造更真品质,

共同实现更高价值,

共同见证商业航天更大的跨越!

——《太空与网络》,观察,记录,传播,引领。

>>>                                           

·《卫星与网络》编辑委员会

高级顾问:王国玉、刘程、童旭东、相振华、王志义、杨烈

· 《卫星与网络》创始人:刘雨菲

· 《卫星与网络》副社长:王俊峰

·  微信公众号(ID:satnetdy)团队
编辑:艳玲、哈玫,周泳、邱莉、黄榕
主笔记者:李刚、魏兴、张雪松、霍剑、乐瑜刀子、赵栋
策划部:杨艳、若㼆、李真子
视觉总监:董泞
专业摄影:冯小京、宋伟
设计部:顾锰、潘希峎、杨小明
行政部:姜河、林紫
业务部:王锦熙、瑾怡
原创文章转载授权、转载文章侵权、投稿等事宜,请加微信:15910858067
商务合作;展览展厅设计、企业VI/CI及室内设计、企业文化建设及品牌推广;企业口碑传播及整体营销传播等,请加微信:13811260603
杂志订阅,请加微信:wangxiaoyu9960
· 卫星与网络各分部:
成都分部负责人:沈淮
长沙分部负责人:宾鸿浦
西安分部负责人:郭朝晖
青岛分部负责人:江伟
· 卫星与网络总部负责人:农燕
· 会议活动部负责人乔颢益、许克新、董今福
· 投融资及战略层面合作:刘雨菲
· 本平台签约设计公司:一画开天(北京)文化创意设计有限公司
· 航天加(深圳)股权投资基金管理负责人:杨艳

微信扫码关注该文公众号作者

来源:太空与网络

相关新闻

早报|华中农大:教师黄某存在学术不端行为;最高检回应举报当地领导被逮捕;涉嫌火箭发射虚假宣传情况立案;泡泡玛特在越南布局供应链卫网君:中国版“星链”还要十年?AI正大规模进入太空;SpaceX发射伽利略卫星;商业航天企业将持续获得这些支持......卫网君:卫星通信面临崩溃还是崛起?星链发射前期SpaceX的财务状况;太空经济如何在16年内达到万亿美元规模;华夏芯被申请破产加拿大争做商业太空发射龙头 获美国技术支持马斯克宣布第三代星舰!可单次向太空,发射200吨有效载荷气体外泄仍发射!NASA太空人"被迫滞留太空",不知何时返回地球波音再遇挫!首送太空人上天发射最后一刻取消25年美高申请必看!美国四大地区该如何选(含:优势和发展情况)从感冒到去世仅4天,38岁宝妈的悲剧令人痛心!医生:感冒后这两种情况务必警惕围观:各券商年终奖发放情况中概股港美上市 | 推送:境外上市备案新规实施情况及关注要点美国夫妇在没人愿意的情况下毅然将房子租给华裔夫妇,后续感动全美全球销量6000万的开发板:“树莓派”上市了——曾坐马斯克的大火箭上太空紧急提醒!为省5元话费,多人手机卡被运营商封停,已有人被公安传唤!需担法律责任吗?律师:视情况而定卫网君:史上性价比最低航天器出炉!《太空法案:保护人类遗产的一小步法》意欲何为?全球商业航天领域正在经历快速发展;加拿大49岁男子流感症状1周后突然死亡!家人崩溃!卫生官警告:这种情况快急诊中国高等院校市场学研究会:2024中国高校市场营销学博士生就业情况白皮书多地宝马4S店出现拒不交车及临时加价情况/曝华为已启动三折叠屏手机研发/周鸿祎谈为何微软蓝屏故障在中国少:大多数企业用360女子参观兵马俑抱孩子走进俑坑,相关部门回应:情况特殊万锦中国女子周四起失踪 警方:情况可疑急急急!万锦华人女子突然失踪,家人着急万分!警方:情况可疑女博士举报教授性骚扰,中国人民大学通报:情况属实!给予王某某开除党籍处分,撤销教授职称,解除聘用关系女博士举报教授性骚扰,人民大学通报:情况属实!给予王某某开除党籍处分,撤销教授职称,解除聘用关系又一病毒来袭!病死率高达20%,无疫苗特效药,这类娃感染后情况最严重!
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 bendi.news
Bendi新闻
Bendi.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Bendi.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。