Bendi新闻
>
判例译析 | 美国证券交易委员会诉Thor技术公司和David Chin案

判例译析 | 美国证券交易委员会诉Thor技术公司和David Chin案

7月前

译者 | 黎   琦 西南政法大学法律硕士

一审 | 李正茂 香港大学普通法学硕士

二审 | 汪晨涵 复旦大学法律硕士

编辑 | 吴   萌 上海外国语大学法律硕士

         仲飞宇 西安外国语大学本科

责编 | 扎恩哈尔·阿黑哈提 新疆农业大学







Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thor Technologies, Inc. and David Chin

美国证券交易委员会诉Thor技术公司和David Chin案


No. 3:22-cv-09043

(N.D. Cal. filed Dec. 21, 2022)

案件编号:22-cv-09043

(本案于2022年12月21日提交至加利福利亚北区联邦地区法院)



导 语

On October 18, 2023, the Honorable Charles R. Breyer of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California entered default judgment against Thor Technologies, Inc. and its CEO and co-founder David Chin for conducting a $2.6 million unregistered offering of crypto asset securities.SEC Obtains Judgment Against Issuer and CEO for Unregistered Crypto Asset Securities Offering.


2023年10月18日,尊敬的美国加利福利亚北区联邦地区法院Charles R. Breyer法官对Thor技术公司及其CEO和联合创始人David Chin等主体所实施的260万美元未经注册的加密资产证券发行行为作出缺席判决。美国证券交易委员会(以下简称SEC)在与发行人Thor技术公司及其CEO和David Chi之间有关未经注册的加密资产证券发行案中胜诉。


(图片来源于网络)


一、原告诉求


The SEC’s complaint, filed on December 21, 2022, against Thor and Chin, alleges that between March and May 2018, the defendants offered and sold crypto assets designated as “Thor Tokens” to the general public for the purpose of funding Thor’s business, which was to develop a software platform for “gig” economy workers and companies. As alleged, Thor and Chin marketed the Thor Tokens as an investment opportunity by promoting the potential increase in value of the tokens and claiming that the tokens would be made available on crypto asset trading platforms. According to the complaint, at the time of the offering, no development work had yet occurred on the Thor platform, and there was no other place to use Thor Tokens. The complaint further alleges that the offers and sales of Thor Tokens, which raised approximately $2.6 million in cash and crypto assets from investors, were not registered with the SEC and did not qualify for any exemption from registration.


2022年12月21日,SEC对Thor和Chin提起诉讼,指控被告于2018年3月和5月期间通过向公众发行并出售被命名为“Thor代币”的加密资产进行融资,为“零工”经济工人和公司开发软件平台。起诉书称,Thor和Chin通过提升Thor代币的潜在价值,将其作为投资机会进行营销,并声称Thor代币可在加密资产交易平台上购买和使用。起诉书还称,在加密资产发行期间,Thor平台上还没有进行任何开发性工作,也没有使用Thor代币的其他渠道。起诉书进一步称,被告通过发行和出售Thor代币,从投资者处筹集了约260万美元的现金和加密资产,但上述行为未向SEC注册且不具备任何豁免注册的条件。


The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Ruth L. Hawley and Erin E. Wilk and supervised by Jeremy E. Pendrey and Monique C. Winkler of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office. The SEC’s litigation was conducted by Marc Katz, Ms. Hawley, and Ms. Wilk.


SEC旧金山地区办公室的Ruth L.Hawley和Erin E.Wilk负责实施调查,Jeremy E.Pendrey和Monique C.Winkler提供指导。Marc Katz、Ms.Hawley和Ms.Wilk则代表SEC提起诉讼。


(图片来源于网络)


二、判决书原文


This matter came before the Court on the motion of Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”) for judgment by default as to the Defendants Thor Technologies, Inc. (“Thor”) and David Chin (“Chin”) (together, “Defendants”). The Court received and considered the SEC’s Complaint, Motion for Default Judgment, and all other evidence and argument presented to the Court.Good cause appearing, the Court grants the Commission’s Motion for Default Judgment,and further ORDERS as follows:


原告美国证券交易委员会(“SEC”或“委员会”)就本事项向法庭提出针对被告Thor技术公司(“Thor”)和David Chin (“Chin”)(合称“被告”)的缺席审判动议。法庭接收并考虑了SEC的起诉书、缺席判决动议及呈递的其他所有证据和理由。法庭认为理据充足,现批准委员会的缺席审判动议并进一步命令:


I.


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a) and 77e(c)] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption:


在无任何可适用豁免理由的情况下,特此命令、判决及裁定,永久限制并禁止被告直接或间接违反《1933年证券法》(“证券法”)第5条第(a)款和(c)款的规定,即:


(a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; or


(a)  除非申请证券上市的注册报告有效,否则任何人直接或间接从事下列活动都是非法的:在州际贸易中利用任何运输或通讯手段或工具,或利用邮寄,通过寄送任何招股说明书或其他文件出售此类证券;或1


(c)Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h].


(c)在州际贸易中利用任何运输或通讯手段或工具,或利用邮寄,通过寄送任何招股说明书或其他文件出售或购买任何证券。但申请证券上市的注册报告已提交至委员会,或根据《证券法》第8条规定,该注册报告被拒绝或停止,或在生效前属于任何行政程序或检查对象的除外。2


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers,agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a). 


兹进一步命令、判决及裁定,根据《联邦民事程序规则》第65条第(d)款第(2)项的规定,以下通过专人送达或其他方式实际接收本终审判决通知的人亦应遵守上述规定:(a)被告的高级职员、代理人、服务人员、员工和律师;及(b)其他与被告或(a)中所述的任何人行动一致或共同参与的人。


(图片来源于网络)


II.


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Section21(d)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5)], Defendants Thor and Chin are permanently restrained and enjoined from participating, directly or indirectly, in any crypto asset securities offering; provided, however, that such injunction shall not prevent Defendant Chin from purchasing or selling securities, including crypto asset securities, for his own personal account.


兹进一步命令、判决及裁定,根据《1934年证券交易法》第21条第(d)款第(5)项规定,永久限制和禁止被告Thor和Chin直接或间接参与任何加密资产证券的发行,但被告Chin可通过其个人账户购买或出售证券,包括加密资产证券。


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers,agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a).


兹进一步命令、判决及裁定,根据《联邦民事程序规则》第65条第(d)款第(2)项的规定,以下通过专人送达或其他方式实际接收本终审判决通知的人亦应遵守上述规定:(a)被告的高级职员、代理人、服务人员、员工和律师;及(b)其他与被告或(a)中所述的任何人行动一致或共同参与的人。


III.


IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: (1)Defendant Chin is liable for a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $150,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)]; and (2) Defendant Thor is liable for disgorgement of $744,555, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $158,638.06, and a civil penalty in the amount of $150,000 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §77t(d)]. Defendant Chin and Defendant Thor shall satisfy these obligation by paying $150,000 and$1,053,193.06, respectively, to the Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment.


(法庭)特此进一步命令、判决及裁定:(1)根据《证券法》第20条第(d)款的规定,被告Chin应承担150,000美元的民事罚款;以及(2)被告Thor应承担追缴款744,555美元,金额相当于起诉书所指控违法行为获得的净利润,及与之相关的迟延利息158,638.06美元和《证券法》第20条第(d)款下规定的150,000美元民事罚款。被告Chin和Thor应在本终审判决登记之日起30日内向委员会分别支付150,000美元和1,053,193.06美元。


Defendants may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendants may also pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to:


被告可向委员会进行电子转账。按照被告要求,委员会将提供详细的自动清算中心(ACH)转账指令或联邦储蓄通信系统(Fedwire)指令。此等支付亦可直接通过SEC网站的Pay.gov进行银行转账,网址为http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm。被告还可使用保兑支票、银行本票或到期的美国邮政汇票进行支付,相关票据交付或邮寄至:


Enterprise Services Center

企业服务中心

Accounts Receivable Branch

应收账款分行

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard

南麦克阿瑟大道6500号

Oklahoma City, OK 73169

俄克拉荷马州俄克拉荷马市,邮编73169


and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, and name of this Court; Thor Technologies, Inc. or David Chin as a defendant in this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment.


同时附上一封信函,确认案件名称、民事诉讼编号及本法庭名称,作为本案被告的Thor技术公司或David Chin,以及明确按照本终审判决兑现支付款项。


Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment and case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By making this payment,Defendants relinquish all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendants.


被告应同时将证明已支付的影印本和案件确认信息发送给本案委员会一方的律师。此款项支付后,被告不再拥有所有普通法及衡平法上的权利、所有权和此等款项的收益,并不得要求返还此等款项的任何部分。


The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, but not limited to, moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry of this Final Judgment. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for penalties by the use of all collection procedures authorized by law, including the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.,and moving for civil contempt for the violation of any Court orders issued in this action.


委员会可动用法律授权的所有催收程序,执行判决所确定的追缴款和迟延利息,包括但不限于在本终审判决登记之日起30日后的任何时候提出藐视法庭的申请。委员会亦可动用法律授权的所有催收程序,执行判决所确定的罚款,包括《联邦债务催收程序法》,及被告违反本案的任何法庭命令提出藐视法庭的申请。


Defendants shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.


根据《1961年美国法典》第28条的规定,被告应在本终审判决登记之日起30日后支付任何到期的判决后利息。


(图片来源于网络)


IV.


IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. 


兹进一步命令、判决及裁定,为执行本终审判决,本法庭保留对本事项的管辖权。


三、结 论


The court granted default judgment for the SEC on all charges. The court permanently enjoined Thor and Chin from violating the securities registration provisions of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 and from participating in any crypto asset securities offering. The court also ordered Thor to pay disgorgement of $744,555 with prejudgment interest of $158,638.06 and ordered Thor and Chin to each pay penalties of $150,000.


法庭对SEC的所有诉求批准缺席判决,即永久禁止Thor和Chin违反《1933年证券法》第5条第(a)款和(c)款关于证券注册的规定,并禁止被告参与任何加密资产证券的发行,同时命令Thor支付追缴款744,555美元及迟延利息158,638.06美元,以及Thor和Chin分别支付150,000美元罚款。


(图片来源于网络)


原文链接:https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr-25884


【注 释】


[1] 原文:SEC. 5. (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, it shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly— (1) to make use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; or 


[2] 原文:SEC. 5. (c) It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, to make use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under section 8

微信扫码关注该文公众号作者

来源:中美法律评论

相关新闻

判例译析 | 跨国公司应为海外侵犯人权行为负责?——雀巢公司诉科特迪瓦案判例译析 | 环联公司案深度解析:董事信义义务标准的建构与反思布朗诉教育委员会案70周年:促使美国变革的一桩诉讼案判例译析 | “道奇诉福特汽车公司”一案如何确立股东至上原则?【广州美国中心活动】消除教育中的种族隔离:布朗诉教育委员会案的深远影响,5月16日,星期四,晚上7:00-8:30判例译析|萨福德联合学区诉雷丁案Safford Unified School District v. Redding判例译析|从Rachel Stone v. ALS上诉案看董事会决议的有效性判例译析 | 封闭型公司中股东的信义义务判例译析 | 奥巴马医疗改革案:从最高院判决看“联邦权力”扩张法律翻译 | 萨尔曼诉美国案:金钱是认定亲属间内幕交易的必备条件?判例译析 | 加拿大贾维斯案件:如何去定义公共场所下的隐私权?判例译析|维和部队违反欧洲人权公约?浅析斯雷布雷尼察大屠杀中不法行为的归责买会员比安卓贵,中国首例消费者诉苹果公司垄断案一审败诉!中国“苹果税”税率全球第一,何时能降?780亿减税案众院委员会过首关提高儿童抵税额恢复营业税减免明年生效第6天!万锦华人女经纪失踪案:市长和地产公司老总公开发声!4000万元不好拿!上海“最牛业委会”追讨物业公司案一审判决被撤销,3天超2000业主签名上诉判例评析|从Blasius案看董事管理权与股东投票权的平衡赔偿6.4亿!“新能源汽车技术秘密第一大案”吉利诉威马终审落槌FBI:美国暴力犯罪率下降,谋杀案和强奸案均骤降逾两成涉嫌一系列名贵珠宝窃案!数年内偷遍亚洲和美国!华人珠宝大盗数月前非法入境寻求庇护 法拉盛落网未开空调致乘客中暑?吉祥航空回应;苹果提出上诉,“消费者诉苹果垄断案”打到最高院丨大公司动态【真实案例】在美国滞留数月会被遣返吗?遣返了怎么再回美国?美国移民成功案例-中国小型投资管理公司合伙人获得 EB-1A 批准2024美国移民律协年会精华汇:案子遭拒?可能是这些原因!
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 bendi.news
Bendi新闻
Bendi.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Bendi.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。